↓ Skip to main content

Studies on Enzymes in Carbohydrate Metabolism of Acetic Acid Bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi, January 1979
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Studies on Enzymes in Carbohydrate Metabolism of Acetic Acid Bacteria
Published in
Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi, January 1979
DOI 10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.53.8_r77
Authors

Osao ADACHI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#1,956
of 7,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,228
of 26,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#16
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.