↓ Skip to main content

Memory and Discourse in Nowa Huta

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Memory and Discourse in Nowa Huta
Published in
Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, January 2013
DOI 10.4057/jsr.64.20
Authors

Sho SUGAWARA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#112
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,490
of 291,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#11
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.