↓ Skip to main content

Temporal changes of Penthorum chinense Pursh population transplanted to the planting ground at the reservoir

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 125)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporal changes of Penthorum chinense Pursh population transplanted to the planting ground at the reservoir
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology, January 2008
DOI 10.7211/jjsrt.34.45
Authors

Sotaro YONEMURA, Hiroto IHARA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#26
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,438
of 168,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Revegetation Technology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them