The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simulation of Long-Period Ground Motion in the Oita Plain Due to a Hypothetical Nankai Earthquake
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan), January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.4294/zisin.61.161 |
| Authors |
Asako IWAKI, Tomotaka IWATA, Haruko SEKIGUCHI, Kimiyuki ASANO, Masayuki YOSHIMI, Haruhiko SUZUKI |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Other | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,782,932
of 25,983,245 outputs
Outputs from Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan)
#62
of 451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,871
of 187,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zisin (Journal of the Seismological Society of Japan)
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,983,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.