↓ Skip to main content

アンモニアを燃焼するガスタービン

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Combustion Society of Japan, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
アンモニアを燃焼するガスタービン
Published in
Journal of the Combustion Society of Japan, December 2017
DOI 10.20619/jcombsj.58.186_215
Authors

壹岐 典彦, 倉田 修

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,583,638
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Combustion Society of Japan
#1
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,618
of 450,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Combustion Society of Japan
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.