The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
「お笑い」の歴史
|
---|---|
Published in |
Japanese Journal of Laughter and Humor Research, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.18991/warai.1.0_12 |
Authors |
相羽 秋夫 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Philosophy | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Laughter and Humor Research
#11
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,922
of 325,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Laughter and Humor Research
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.