↓ Skip to main content

戦犯の墓碑を支える人々 : 興亜観音・殉国七士の碑をめぐって(聖地・慰霊・宗教的ナショナリズムの再構築,パネル,<特集>第六十五回学術大会紀要)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of religious studies, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
戦犯の墓碑を支える人々 : 興亜観音・殉国七士の碑をめぐって(聖地・慰霊・宗教的ナショナリズムの再構築,パネル,<特集>第六十五回学術大会紀要)
Published in
Journal of religious studies, July 2017
DOI 10.20716/rsjars.80.4_973
Authors

加藤 信行

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of religious studies
#55
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,729
of 325,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of religious studies
#17
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.