↓ Skip to main content

近世上方における名所と風景―秋里籬島編『都名所図会』・『摂津名所図会』を中心に―

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Human Geography, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
近世上方における名所と風景―秋里籬島編『都名所図会』・『摂津名所図会』を中心に―
Published in
Japanese Journal of Human Geography, January 2018
DOI 10.4200/jjhg.64.1_19
Authors

長谷川 奨悟

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Human Geography
#69
of 389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,857
of 453,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Human Geography
#9
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 389 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.