↓ Skip to main content

生きている漁具の化石 : 沖縄宮古群島におけるkakiの研究

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ethnology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 174)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
生きている漁具の化石 : 沖縄宮古群島におけるkakiの研究
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ethnology, March 2018
DOI 10.14890/minkennewseries.44.3_223
Authors

西村 朝日太郎

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ethnology
#20
of 174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,261
of 345,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ethnology
#17
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 174 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.