↓ Skip to main content

ニハイチュウ (中生動物) の生物学

Overview of attention for article published in Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry), March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ニハイチュウ (中生動物) の生物学
Published in
Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry), March 2011
DOI 10.3330/hikakuseiriseika.13.209
Authors

古屋 秀隆

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry)
#32
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,591
of 120,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hikaku seiri seikagaku(Comparative Physiology and Biochemistry)
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.