↓ Skip to main content

S202011 世界航空技術史における二宮忠八の評価([S20201]機械技術史・工学史(1))

Overview of attention for article published in The Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Congress, Japan, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
S202011 世界航空技術史における二宮忠八の評価([S20201]機械技術史・工学史(1))
Published in
The Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Congress, Japan, June 2017
DOI 10.1299/jsmemecj.2011._s202011-1
Authors

城下 荘平

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Congress, Japan
#5
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,443
of 330,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Congress, Japan
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.