The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
慶應義塾大学における電子ジャーナル管理の現状と展望 : EJアクセシビリティを中心として(<特集>電子ジャーナルの現状)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.18919/jkg.55.6_257 |
| Authors |
田邊 稔, 山田 雅子 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#121
of 1,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,307
of 328,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Science & Technology Association/Joho no Kagaku to Gijutsu
#15
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.