↓ Skip to main content

ザクロ発酵液の毛穴の目立ち改善効果

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 116)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ザクロ発酵液の毛穴の目立ち改善効果
Published in
Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan, March 2017
DOI 10.5107/sccj.51.27
Authors

山口 弘毅, 大隅 和寿, 坂井田 勉, 広瀬 統, 八代 洋一, 中田 悟

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan
#17
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,639
of 324,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Society of Cosmetic Chemists of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them