↓ Skip to main content

沿岸漁業の原点を探る -小型底びき網漁業の発達過程に見る人と技術の関わり-

Overview of attention for article published in The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 216)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
沿岸漁業の原点を探る -小型底びき網漁業の発達過程に見る人と技術の関わり-
Published in
The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics, August 2020
DOI 10.5100/jje.56.s2d1-01
Authors

川崎 潤二

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics
#36
of 216 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,474
of 427,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japanese Journal of Ergonomics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them