↓ Skip to main content

高松にダム7杯分の地下水

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 140)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
高松にダム7杯分の地下水
Published in
The Journal of The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan, April 2008
DOI 10.1541/ieejjournal.115.376
Authors

川崎 憲介

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan
#21
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,642
of 95,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of The Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them