↓ Skip to main content

麻酔科医から見た医療事故防止対策

Overview of attention for article published in The Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 156)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
麻酔科医から見た医療事故防止対策
Published in
The Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, June 2010
DOI 10.5112/jjlp.45.173
Authors

芦澤 直文

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from The Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics
#21
of 156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,701
of 105,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Japan Journal of Logopedics and Phoniatrics
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 156 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.