↓ Skip to main content

[A04] 映像遺産の保存と活用:科学映像館活動10年のあゆみ

Overview of attention for article published in Dejitaru Akaibu Gakkaishi, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
[A04] 映像遺産の保存と活用:科学映像館活動10年のあゆみ
Published in
Dejitaru Akaibu Gakkaishi, September 2017
DOI 10.24506/jsda.1.pre_21
Authors

久米川 正好

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Dejitaru Akaibu Gakkaishi
#71
of 536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,038
of 325,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dejitaru Akaibu Gakkaishi
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 536 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.