↓ Skip to main content

いもち病菌の分類と寄生性分化

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Phytopathology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 132)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
いもち病菌の分類と寄生性分化
Published in
Japanese Journal of Phytopathology, December 2014
DOI 10.3186/jjphytopath.80.s32
Authors

土佐 幸雄, 中馬 いづみ

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Phytopathology
#22
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,630
of 362,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Phytopathology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them