↓ Skip to main content

Implementation and outlook of a new repository system at the National Institute of Materials Science

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation and outlook of a new repository system at the National Institute of Materials Science
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2009
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.51.888
Authors

Mikiko TANIFUJI, Masao TAKAKU, Shingo OTSUKA, Shin-ichi TODOROKI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#343
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,612
of 185,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.