↓ Skip to main content

読めて使える美しい火山地質図を安価で市場に出す

Overview of attention for article published in Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 127)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
読めて使える美しい火山地質図を安価で市場に出す
Published in
Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association, November 2016
DOI 10.11212/jjca.53.1_57
Authors

早川 由紀夫, 萩原 佐知子, 野村 正弘, 小山 真人

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,831,263
of 26,097,697 outputs
Outputs from Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association
#30
of 127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,202
of 421,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Map, Journal of the Japan Cartographers Association
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,097,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.