The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
インターフェロン療法によりクリオグロブリン血症,膜性増殖性糸球体腎炎が共に改善した慢性C型肝炎症例
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology, February 2008
|
DOI | 10.11405/nisshoshi1964.98.564 |
Authors |
道免 和文, 千住 恵, 西本 愛, 重松 宏尚, 山崎 文朗, 入江 康司, 石橋 大海 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 33% |
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology
#30
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,288
of 96,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of gastro-enterology
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.