↓ Skip to main content

On the Terminology of Glacial Drifts and Glacial Landforms

Overview of attention for article published in The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu), January 1968
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 215)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the Terminology of Glacial Drifts and Glacial Landforms
Published in
The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu), January 1968
DOI 10.4116/jaqua.7.59
Authors

Torao YOSHIKAWA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#45
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,313
of 13,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.