↓ Skip to main content

HUENIA HERALDICA, THE CORRECT NAME FOR HUENIA PROTEUS, AND THE NAME OF THE TYPE SPECIES OF THE GENUS HUENIA

Overview of attention for article published in Researches on Crustasea, January 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HUENIA HERALDICA, THE CORRECT NAME FOR HUENIA PROTEUS, AND THE NAME OF THE TYPE SPECIES OF THE GENUS HUENIA
Published in
Researches on Crustasea, January 1987
DOI 10.18353/rcustacea.16.0_15
Authors

L. B. HOLTHUIS, 酒井 勝司

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 40%
Researcher 2 40%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 60%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,119,076
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Researches on Crustasea
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,133
of 47,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Researches on Crustasea
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them