The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A New Sampling Method of Unconsolidated Sediments by Long Geo-slicer, a Pile-type Soil Sampler
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Japan Society of Engineering Geology, January 1998
|
| DOI | 10.5110/jjseg.39.306 |
| Authors |
Tsuyoshi HARAGUCHI, Takashi NAKATA, Kunihiko SHIMAZAKI, Toshifumi IMAIZUMI, Keiji KOJIMA, Koson ISHIMARU |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,875,193
of 26,203,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Society of Engineering Geology
#8
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,150
of 96,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Society of Engineering Geology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,203,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them