↓ Skip to main content

Preserved paratypes of Kuroda’s (1924) Ryukyu mammals

Overview of attention for article published in Mammal Study, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 207)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preserved paratypes of Kuroda’s (1924) Ryukyu mammals
Published in
Mammal Study, January 2002
DOI 10.3106/mammalstudy.27.145
Authors

Masaharu Motokawa, Kishio Maeda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Study
#46
of 207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,018
of 124,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Study
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them