↓ Skip to main content

Variation and Systematic Significance in Vertebral Counts in Some Rats of Muridae and Cricetidae (Preliminary Note)

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 1959
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 161)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation and Systematic Significance in Vertebral Counts in Some Rats of Muridae and Cricetidae (Preliminary Note)
Published in
Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology, January 1959
DOI 10.1303/jjaez.3.255
Authors

Takeo MIYAO, Tetsuro KITAZAWA, Motomi MOROZUMI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2013.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#25
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#527
of 6,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Applied Entomology and Zoology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,440 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.