↓ Skip to main content

アマゾン流域におけるコショウ胴枯病および根腐病の過去における発生の実態

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
アマゾン流域におけるコショウ胴枯病および根腐病の過去における発生の実態
Published in
Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society, October 2012
DOI 10.4165/kapps1958.24.0_20
Authors

福富 雅夫, 平形 〓, 浜田 正博

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2021.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society
#5
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,294
of 203,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Report of The Kansai Plant Protection Society
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 33 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them