↓ Skip to main content

Transmission of the possible pathogen of mulberry dwarf disease by a new leafhopper vector, Hishimonoides sellatiformis ISHIHARA

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Sericultural Science of Japan, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transmission of the possible pathogen of mulberry dwarf disease by a new leafhopper vector, Hishimonoides sellatiformis ISHIHARA
Published in
The Journal of Sericultural Science of Japan, July 2010
DOI 10.11416/kontyushigen1930.40.136
Authors

Takashi ISHIZIMA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2014.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Sericultural Science of Japan
#3
of 31 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,533
of 105,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Sericultural Science of Japan
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one scored the same or higher as 28 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.