↓ Skip to main content

Photoinactivation of Taka-Amylase A

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi, January 1965
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Photoinactivation of Taka-Amylase A
Published in
Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi, January 1965
DOI 10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.39.10
Authors

Sam Soon KIM

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,875,193
of 26,203,160 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#1,978
of 7,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#904
of 10,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Nōgeikagaku Kaishi
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,203,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.