↓ Skip to main content

粗大粒団を含むカラムからのNO_3^-の流出

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
粗大粒団を含むカラムからのNO_3^-の流出
Published in
Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, June 2017
DOI 10.20710/dojo.50.1_17
Authors

佐久間 敏雄, 老松 博行, 飯塚 文男, 岡島 秀夫

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,891,409
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
#12
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,027
of 333,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
#10
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.