↓ Skip to main content

肺結核患者におけるロールシヤツハ反応

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Psychology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
肺結核患者におけるロールシヤツハ反応
Published in
Japanese Journal of Psychology, July 2010
DOI 10.4992/jjpsy.26.118
Authors

片口 安史

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#165
of 692 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,116
of 106,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Psychology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 692 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.