↓ Skip to main content

アクセントの音程ときこえ

Overview of attention for article published in GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan), November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 182)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
アクセントの音程ときこえ
Published in
GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan), November 2010
DOI 10.11435/gengo1939.1971.79
Authors

杉藤 美代子

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan)
#50
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,489
of 192,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GENGO KENKYU (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan)
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.