↓ Skip to main content

7. 第一鹿島と襟裳海山の地形(日本火山学会 1984 年度春季大会講演要旨)

Overview of attention for article published in SECOND SERIES BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
7. 第一鹿島と襟裳海山の地形(日本火山学会 1984 年度春季大会講演要旨)
Published in
SECOND SERIES BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, January 2018
DOI 10.18940/kazanc.29.4_305_2
Authors

中村 保夫, 他KAIKO計画・LEG III乗船科学者一同

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from SECOND SERIES BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#7
of 75 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,743
of 472,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SECOND SERIES BULLETIN OF THE VOLCANOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.