↓ Skip to main content

On the “calcareous sandstone” taken during the KAIKO-NANKAI Project

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Sedimentological Society of Japan, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On the “calcareous sandstone” taken during the KAIKO-NANKAI Project
Published in
Journal of the Sedimentological Society of Japan, May 2010
DOI 10.14860/jssj1972.34.131
Authors

Yujiro OGAWA, SOH Wonn, ASHI Juichiro, Hitoshi SAKAI, Kazuo KOBAYASHI

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Sedimentological Society of Japan
#1
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,875
of 107,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Sedimentological Society of Japan
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one scored the same or higher as 9 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them