The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a self-efficacy scale for base-running and an examination of its effectiveness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences), January 2006
|
| DOI | 10.5432/jjpehss.51.677 |
| Authors |
Atsushi Kiuchi, Hirokazu Arai |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,647,757
of 25,655,374 outputs
Outputs from Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)
#64
of 298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,652
of 174,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Taiikugaku kenkyu (Japan Journal of Physical Education, Health and Sport Sciences)
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,655,374 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 298 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.