↓ Skip to main content

Geology of the Central and Southern Parts of the Acid Igneous Complex (Kumano Acidic Rocks) in Southeastern Kii Peninsula

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, January 1965
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geology of the Central and Southern Parts of the Acid Igneous Complex (Kumano Acidic Rocks) in Southeastern Kii Peninsula
Published in
Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, January 1965
DOI 10.5575/geosoc.71.494
Authors

Shigeo ARAMAKI, HADA Shinobu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,835,526
of 26,106,397 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#85
of 617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#899
of 10,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,106,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them