↓ Skip to main content

研究 心筋硬塞と血液凝固

Overview of attention for article published in Shinzo, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 159)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
研究 心筋硬塞と血液凝固
Published in
Shinzo, May 2013
DOI 10.11281/shinzo1969.1.11_1131
Authors

村上 元孝, 松田 保, 西野 哲夫, 平丸 三樹, 万見 新太郎, 高瀬 雅子

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Shinzo
#16
of 159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,332
of 209,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Shinzo
#5
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 159 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.