↓ Skip to main content

腎不全の血小板異常

Overview of attention for article published in [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 727)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
腎不全の血小板異常
Published in
[Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, October 2008
DOI 10.11406/rinketsu.15.487
Authors

小竹 要, 大江 国広, 長谷田 恭子, 吉野 公明, 万見 新太郎, 黒田 満彦, 松田 保, 竹田 亮祐, 村上 元孝

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,891,409
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology
#49
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,112
of 106,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Rinshō ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.