↓ Skip to main content

三島通良(みしまみちよし)の論文「学制調査資料・就学年齢問題」(1902年)に関する一考察

Overview of attention for article published in RESEARCH on EARLY CHILDHOOD CARE and EDUCATION in JAPAN, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
三島通良(みしまみちよし)の論文「学制調査資料・就学年齢問題」(1902年)に関する一考察
Published in
RESEARCH on EARLY CHILDHOOD CARE and EDUCATION in JAPAN, August 2017
DOI 10.20617/reccej.43.1_51
Authors

近藤 幹生

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,891,409
of 26,243,859 outputs
Outputs from RESEARCH on EARLY CHILDHOOD CARE and EDUCATION in JAPAN
#3
of 24 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,229
of 332,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from RESEARCH on EARLY CHILDHOOD CARE and EDUCATION in JAPAN
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,243,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them