↓ Skip to main content

微小領域での振動分光法とその地球化学研究への応用

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Geochimica, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 141)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
微小領域での振動分光法とその地球化学研究への応用
Published in
Acta Geochimica, December 2016
DOI 10.14934/chikyukagaku.32.45
Authors

鍵 裕之, 奈良 雅之

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,930
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Acta Geochimica
#27
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,539
of 425,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Geochimica
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.