↓ Skip to main content

332 微細な縦割れを有するC_2S-CZ型熱遮蔽皮膜の開発(OS5-3 組織制御と残留応力,OS5 コーティング部材の組織制御と高機能化3)

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the 1992 Annual Meeting of JSME/MMD, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
332 微細な縦割れを有するC_2S-CZ型熱遮蔽皮膜の開発(OS5-3 組織制御と残留応力,OS5 コーティング部材の組織制御と高機能化3)
Published in
Proceedings of the 1992 Annual Meeting of JSME/MMD, August 2017
DOI 10.1299/jsmezairiki.2005.0_239
Authors

Hideaki YAMANO, Noriyuki MIFUNE, Kazumi TANI, Yoshio HARADA

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the 1992 Annual Meeting of JSME/MMD
#1
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,332
of 327,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the 1992 Annual Meeting of JSME/MMD
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them