↓ Skip to main content

The Form and Function of some Gardens in Kyoto in 1565 that can be Read from the Description of History of Japan by Luis Frois

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#31 of 182)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Form and Function of some Gardens in Kyoto in 1565 that can be Read from the Description of History of Japan by Luis Frois
Published in
Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture, January 2005
DOI 10.5632/jila.68.369
Authors

ONO Kenkichi

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#31
of 182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,862
of 151,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Japanese Institute of Landscape Architecture
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.