↓ Skip to main content

セラミド含有ドレッシング材による皮膚へのセラミドデリバリーは皮膚バリア機能を回復する

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nursing Science and Engineering, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
セラミド含有ドレッシング材による皮膚へのセラミドデリバリーは皮膚バリア機能を回復する
Published in
Journal of Nursing Science and Engineering, February 2018
DOI 10.24462/jnse.2.3_174
Authors

仲上 豪二朗, 久保 貴史, 川波 一美, 岩嵜 徹治, 真田 弘美

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2018.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nursing Science and Engineering
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,047
of 345,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nursing Science and Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them