↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Chondroitin Sulfate from Salmon Nasal Cartilage on Intestinal Absorption of Glucose

Overview of attention for article published in Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi, January 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Chondroitin Sulfate from Salmon Nasal Cartilage on Intestinal Absorption of Glucose
Published in
Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi, January 1998
DOI 10.4327/jsnfs.51.213
Authors

Tadaaki TAKEDA, Mitsuo MAJIMA, Hiromichi OKUDA

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi
#73
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,029
of 95,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nippon Eiyo Shokuryo Gakkaishi
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.