↓ Skip to main content

白馬山系蛇紋岩地の土壌特性と高山植物群落 (<特集>中部山岳地域の高山植生と地球温暖化)

Overview of attention for article published in JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
白馬山系蛇紋岩地の土壌特性と高山植物群落 (<特集>中部山岳地域の高山植生と地球温暖化)
Published in
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, September 2016
DOI 10.18960/seitai.58.3_199
Authors

波多野 肇, 増沢 武弘

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
#63
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,028
of 330,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAPANESE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.