The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
近年の農業へのケイ酸利用と研究 : 連載開始にあたって
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.20710/dojo.83.3_315 |
| Authors |
藤井 弘志 |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2024.
All research outputs
#8,300,289
of 26,254,370 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
#9
of 99 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,477
of 333,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
#7
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,254,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.