↓ Skip to main content

日本初の電気式補聴器「リッカフオン」について -加藤亨と聴話教育-

Overview of attention for article published in AUDIOLOGY JAPAN, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 134)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
日本初の電気式補聴器「リッカフオン」について -加藤亨と聴話教育-
Published in
AUDIOLOGY JAPAN, December 2013
DOI 10.4295/audiology.54.463
Authors

坂井 美惠子, 村岡 輝雄, 三浦 貴大, 中道 勝久, 伊福部 達

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from AUDIOLOGY JAPAN
#17
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,032
of 322,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AUDIOLOGY JAPAN
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them