The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
化膿性汗腺炎におけるアダリムマブの使用上の注意/化膿性汗腺炎の診療の手引き
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, March 2019
|
DOI | 10.14924/dermatol.129.325 |
Authors |
アダリムマブ・化膿性汗腺炎診療の手引き策定委員会, 照井 正, 大槻 マミ太郎, 黒川 一郎, 佐藤 伸一, 高橋 健造, 鳥居 秀嗣, 林 伸和, 森田 明理 |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#89
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,453
of 365,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them