↓ Skip to main content

Mechanism of End Breakage due to Knot in Knitting Zone of 1*1 Rib.

Overview of attention for article published in Sen'i Kikai Gakkaishi (Journal of the Textile Machinery Society of Japan), January 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanism of End Breakage due to Knot in Knitting Zone of 1*1 Rib.
Published in
Sen'i Kikai Gakkaishi (Journal of the Textile Machinery Society of Japan), January 1996
DOI 10.4188/transjtmsj.49.12_t313
Authors

Ryuzo Oinuma, Ikuo Narisawa, Kiyohito Koyama

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Sen'i Kikai Gakkaishi (Journal of the Textile Machinery Society of Japan)
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,258
of 81,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sen'i Kikai Gakkaishi (Journal of the Textile Machinery Society of Japan)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them