↓ Skip to main content

飛騨外縁帯のシルル系・デボン系放散虫生層序

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
飛騨外縁帯のシルル系・デボン系放散虫生層序
Published in
Journal of the Geological Society of Japan, January 2005
DOI 10.5575/geosoc.110.620
Authors

栗原 敏之

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,850,671 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#85
of 604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,572
of 159,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Geological Society of Japan
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,671 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.